Sunday, 8 January 2017

RMI3500: Practice Questions

RMI3500: Practice Questions


Practice Exam


RMI3500: Practice Questions


Each of the following questions would be worth two (2) points


1) Suppose that you and your friend get into an argument about which is the longest river in the world. Your friend insists that it is the Mississippi-Missouri, and ends up betting you a round of drinks. Sure enough, you look it up, and your friend is wrong1. Which of the three forms of overconfidence did your friend display?


2) Explain how currency exchange rate risk would affect someone working in Australia and earning US dollars.


3) Explain how you would use opportunity cost to reduce congestion on Atlanta’s roads.


4) Suppose I offer you the following gamble: I will toss a fair coin. If it comes up heads, you get $100; if it comes up tails, you get nothing.


a) What is the expected value of this gamble?


b) State how much you would be willing to pay to play this game. Given this answer, what is your risk premium? (Hint: this requires answering (a). If you could not answer (a), define the risk premium).


5) A strong wind knocks down a big tree at the front of the yard, which smashes into a fire hydrant, which bursts open and the water flows downhill into the insured’s home, flooding the basement and first floor. The insurer denies the claim due to flood exclusion. Do you agree with that decision? Explain your reasons.


6) Patrice has a full-time job, but she also has a part-time home business: she sells custom stationary. She does this from her extra room at her home, where she has her samples and meets clients and takes orders. Patrice wonders what the right way is to insure this. Advise her.


7) Denise lives with her parents while she works part-time. She has her own car. Her parents spend half the year in Costa Rica. Denise then uses her parents’ car all the time to keep the mileage off her own car. If Denise is in an accident, will her own auto insurance cover the claim? Why or why not?


8) Airport parking can be unavailable and taxis can be expensive during Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. Marty decides to help his friends during those holidays who need to get to and from the airport. And Marty wants to make a little extra money. He will charge them $12 to take them to the airport, and $12 to pick them up. He will only do this for his friends or a friend of a friend. If Marty gets into an automobile accident, how should his auto insurance handle the claim?


1. It is generally believed to be either the Nile or the Amazon


RMI3500: Practice Questions


9) The Georgia legislature is in session. A local television host shows video of a capitol hearing and says of a nursing student who is testifying about health care, “she is the best looking witness they’ve called in a long time. She has a lot of experience with beds, that’s for sure. And now she wants to be a nurse. Familiar territory to her. No surprise she was invited to the capital. They are all whores there.”


a) If the student makes a claim against the television host, what would her claim be?


b) If the TV host has insurance, what specific type of insurance might cover this, and would it actually cover this claim – why?


10) Explain whether, and why, an underwriter will likely charge more or less premium to insure a 3,000 square meter business building constructed of cinder blocks with fire sprinklers, against a 3,000 square meter pretty wooden loft building with fireplace.


RMI3500: Practice Questions


Case Question – 10 points


(Note: Names have been changed from the original case.)


On August 1, 1989, James Jones shot and killed Brian Smith. Smith, who at that time was residing with the Jones’ neighbor, was allegedly intoxicated that afternoon and evening. The Joneses saw Smith acting aggressively and erratically. They were also informed by their nephew, who was visiting them that day, that Smith had told him that he could kill the nephew with his bare hands. About eleven o’clock that evening, Smith shot an automatic weapon into Lake St. Clair and threatened “to kill someone.” At that point, James Jones, who had become alarmed at Smith’s behavior during the course of the afternoon and was feeling very frightened at Smith’s threat to harm someone, retrieved his twelve-gauge shotgun from his garage.


Jones did not use the gun until later that evening when Marion Jones saw Smith scaling up the Jones’ garage and approaching the window to the room where she and the children were. Jones did not actually see Smith’s weapon, but erroneously assumed that Smith still had the automatic weapon and was going to use it to harm his wife and children. Jones got his twelve-gauge shotgun, aimed at Smith, and shot him in the stomach. Smith died as a result of the shooting.


Despite the fact that Smith was unarmed when Jones shot and killed him, the St. Clair County prosecutor never brought charges against Jones for the shooting.


On November 20, 1989, Smith’s father filed a wrongful death action against the Joneses. Does the Jones’ insurance company, Auto–Owners Insurance Company, have a legal duty to defend the Joneses? Discuss, citing HO-3.


(Note: While this is based on an actual case, your answer will not be marked in terms of how closely it resembles the decision of the court, but rather on the strength of your argument)


Term Paper Help, Research Paper Help, Essay Help



RMI3500: Practice Questions

Week 3 MGMT335 IP Assignment

Week 3 MGMT335 IP Assignment


Scenario: You have just started work as the new Human Resources Manager for Acme Manufacturing, a Fortune 1,000 company. The job has been vacant for six months now. You’ve been wondering about this, especially since reading about employee harassment incidents and fights recently in the news.


The General Manager (GM) calls you into his office the minute you arrive. He shuts the door after saying a quick word of welcome, and begins to tell you about an incident that happened last week that needs your immediate attention. The company’s manufacturing operations runs three shifts of production workers so the plant is operating 24/7. Over the past six months hostilities have arisen between employees on the third and first shifts. What started out as jeering and criticisms by the first shift, claiming they have to clean up the mess and complete all of the work left undone by the third shift, has escalated to physical confrontations and altercations. Although the GM said that aggressive bantering back-and-forth is common for shift workers in manufacturing, he admitted he was worried after seeing a gun on one of the employees last week that was concealed, or so the employee thought, in a shoulder holster under this jacket. The GM said he needs your help. Specifically, he asked that you:

Determine and explain the appropriate disciplinary action for the employees involved in this situation and identify motivational alternatives that can help turn the situation around; Draft policies and procedures that could be used in the guidance and performance management of the shift workers; and Develop performance standards for the shift workers, identify appropriate methods of performance appraisal, and develop appropriate training to help get them back on track.


Feeling overwhelmed by the enormity of the situation, you go back to your office and begin devising a plan to help get employee relations back on track, realizing that human resource policies and practices may help avert potentially dangerous situations in the future if implemented correctly.


Write a 8-10 page memo to the GM responding to the three concerns listed above. Be sure to cite any references used in proper APA format.


Term Paper Help, Research Paper Help, Essay Help



Week 3 MGMT335 IP Assignment

Management Homework assistance

Management Homework assistance


Scenario: You have just started work as the new Human Resources Manager for Acme Manufacturing, a Fortune 1,000 company. The job has been vacant for six months now. You have been wondering about this, especially since reading about employee harassment incidents and fights recently in the news.


The General Manager (GM) calls you into his office the minute you arrive. He shuts the door after saying a quick word of welcome, and begins to tell you about an incident that happened last week that needs your immediate attention. The company’s manufacturing operations runs three shifts of production workers so the plant is operating 24/7. Over the past six months hostilities have arisen between employees on the third and first shifts. What started out as jeering and criticisms by the first shift, claiming they have to clean up the mess and complete all of the work left undone by the third shift, has escalated to physical confrontations and altercations. Although the GM said that aggressive bantering back-and-forth is common for shift workers in manufacturing, he admitted he was worried after seeing a gun on one of the employees last week that was concealed, or so the employee thought, in a shoulder holster under this jacket. The GM said he needs your help. Specifically, he asked that you:

Determine and explain the appropriate disciplinary action for the employees involved in this situation and identify motivational alternatives that can help turn the situation around; Draft policies and procedures that could be used in the guidance and performance management of the shift workers; and Develop performance standards for the shift workers, identify appropriate methods of performance appraisal, and develop appropriate training to help get them back on track.


Feeling overwhelmed by the enormity of the situation, you go back to your office and begin devising a plan to help get employee relations back on track, realizing that human resource policies and practices may help avert potentially dangerous situations in the future if implemented correctly.


Write a 8-10 page memo to the GM responding to the three concerns listed above. Be sure to cite any references used in proper APA format.


Term Paper Help, Research Paper Help, Essay Help



Management Homework assistance

Business Ethics 4 page paper

Business Ethics 4 page paper


You will be graded on the following criteria:


Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

Analyze the questions associated with your chosen case study and discuss them using concepts you learned in this course. Explain your rationale for each of your answers to your chosen case study. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements: Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length. Cite your textbook as a reference. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.


Case 8.4: Have Gun, Will Travel…to Work


Located on page 312 of your textbook

Do you have not only a legal, but a moral right to own a gun? Do you believe that you have either a moral or a legal right to park a car with a loaded gun in a privately owned parking lot, regardless of what the lot’s owner wants? In your view, do employees have either a moral or a legal right to park cars with guns in them in the company parking lot? What do you believe should be the property rights and safety concerns of employers? Do you think state legislatures are right to get involved, or should the matter be left to companies and employees to settle? Because the workplace is the company’s private property, the company could choose to allow employees to bring guns not only into the parking lot, but also into the workplace itself. Are there ever circumstances in which doing so might be reasonable? Or would the presence of guns automatically violate the rights of other employees to be guaranteed a safe working environment?


Term Paper Help, Research Paper Help, Essay Help



Business Ethics 4 page paper

Assignment 2: Workplace Ethics

Assignment 2: Workplace Ethics


Due Week 8 and worth 275 points


Overview


This assignment will give you the opportunity to choose a case study, and then write about the ethical implications and the impact of the events that are described. Each case study includes a set of questions that you should answer. You can choose either Case Study 9.1: Unprofessional Conduct, or Case Study 8.4: Have Gun Will Travel.


You will be graded on the following criteria:


Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

Analyze the questions associated with your chosen case study and discuss them using concepts you learned in this course. Explain your rationale for each of your answers to your chosen case study. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements: Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length. Cite your textbook as a reference. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.


The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Determine the considerations for and process of ethical business decision making to balance corporate and social responsibilities and address moral, economic, and legal concerns. Analyze selected business situations using the predominant ethical theories, such as utilitarian, Kantian, and virtue ethics to guide ethical business decision making. Determine the implications and impact of various civil liberty laws in the workplace, such as hiring, promotion, discipline, discharge, and wage discrimination. Use technology and information resources to research issues in business ethics. Write clearly and concisely about business ethics using proper writing mechanics.


Click here to view the grading rubric.


Choose one (1) of the following case studies for Assignment 2:


Case 9.1: Unprofessional Conduct?


Located on page 342 of your textbook

Do you believe the Board of Education violated her right to privacy? Were they justified in firing her? Explain two to three (2-3) major reasons why or why not. Was Pettit’s behavior unprofessional or immoral? Do you believe she was unfit to teach? Provide a rationale for your position. If teachers have good performance inside the classroom, should they also be held to a higher moral standard outside the classroom? Explain why or why not. Analyze five (5) behaviors you believe would show unprofessional or immoral conduct for a teacher.


Case 8.4: Have Gun, Will Travel…to Work


Located on page 312 of your textbook

Do you have not only a legal, but a moral right to own a gun? Do you believe that you have either a moral or a legal right to park a car with a loaded gun in a privately owned parking lot, regardless of what the lot’s owner wants? In your view, do employees have either a moral or a legal right to park cars with guns in them in the company parking lot? What do you believe should be the property rights and safety concerns of employers? Do you think state legislatures are right to get involved, or should the matter be left to companies and employees to settle? Because the workplace is the company’s private property, the company could choose to allow employees to bring guns not only into the parking lot, but also into the workplace itself. Are there ever circumstances in which doing so might be reasonable? Or would the presence of guns automatically violate the rights of other employees to be guaranteed a safe working environment?


Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.


Points: 275


Assignment 2: Workplace Ethics


Criteria


Unacceptable


Below 60% F


Meets Minimum Expectations


60-69% D


Fair


70-79% C


Proficient


80-89% B


Exemplary


90-100% A


1. Analyze the questions associated with your chosen case study and discuss them using concepts you learned in this course.


Weight: 45%


Did not submit or incompletelyanalyzed the questions associated with your chosen case study and did not submit or incompletely discussed them using concepts you learned in this course.


Insufficientlyanalyzed the questions associated with your chosen case study and insufficiently discussed them using concepts you learned in this course.


Partially analyzed the questions associated with your chosen case study and partially discussed them using concepts you learned in this course.


Satisfactorilyanalyzed the questions associated with your chosen case study and satisfactorily discussed them using concepts you learned in this course.


Thoroughlyanalyzed the questions associated with your chosen case study and thoroughly discussed them using concepts you learned in this course.


2. Explain your rationale for each of your answers to your chosen case study.


Weight: 45%


Did not submit or incompletelyexplained your rationale for each of your answers to your chosen case study.


Insufficientlyexplained your rationale for each of your answers to your chosen case study.


Partially explained your rationale for each of your answers to your chosen case study.


Satisfactorilyexplained your rationale for each of your answers to your chosen case study.


Thoroughlyexplained your rationale for each of your answers to your chosen case study.


3. Clarity, writing mechanics, citations, and formatting requirements


Weight: 10%


More than 8 errors present


7-8 errors present


5-6 errors present


3-4 errors press


Term Paper Help, Research Paper Help, Essay Help



Assignment 2: Workplace Ethics

Assignment 2: Stakeholder Analysis

Assignment 2: Stakeholder Analysis


Assignment 2: Stakeholder Analysis

Due Week 5 and worth 150 points


Preparation

•Review Chapters 3 and 8.

•Read Review Question 8 located at the end of Chapter 3.


◦Select two (2) editorials / essays / columns (by staff or freelance writers) on a current issue of public policy from two (2) different publications (large metropolitan or national newspaper such as Washington Post or the New York Times or national magazines such as Newsweek, Time, and The New Republic.)

•Examine Box 3.0 – Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis.

•Read Demonstration Exercise 1 located at the end of Chapter 3.


◦Choose a policy issue area in the U.S. such as gun control, violent crime control, white-collar crime, illegal drugs, medical insurance fraud, and environmental protection of waterways, job creation, affordable health care, or Medicare.

•Other preparation


◦Explore the chart features of Excel, PowerPoint for use in this assignment.

Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:(Note: Refer to Review Question 8 located at the end of Chapter 3 for criteria 1-3.)


1. Apply the procedures for argumentation analysis (located in Chapter 8) to display contending positions and underlying assumptions for the content of Review Question 1.

2. Rate the assumptions and plot them according to their plausibility and importance. (Refer to Figure 3.16, “Distribution of warrant by plausibility and importance.”)

3. Determine which arguments are the most plausible. Provide a rationale for your views.


Term Paper Help, Research Paper Help, Essay Help



Assignment 2: Stakeholder Analysis

Applying Ethics: Utilizing Normative Frameworks for Decision Making

Applying Ethics: Utilizing Normative Frameworks for Decision Making


“Applying Ethics: Utilizing Normative Frameworks for Decision Making” Please respond to the following:


Assume you are a police officer pursuing a person under arrest who stole an officer’s gun and escaped from the police vehicle. Analyze the relevance of the utilitarian approach to evaluating consequences of decisions about the pursuit. Recommend at least two options the pursuing officers could take in the situation.

Assume you are a law enforcement professional who has taken a course in ethics and decision making. Examine two possible conflicting issues that might arise when duties and obligations collide. Describe a situation and apply Kantianism to recommend viable, acceptable options.

Support your views with examples. (Cite your sources.)


Term Paper Help, Research Paper Help, Essay Help



Applying Ethics: Utilizing Normative Frameworks for Decision Making